The recent San Diego Superior Court decision (Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National City, et al.) to reverse the City of National City’s redevelopment plan amendment is more than meets the eye.
Touted as a victory for land owners not desirous of being paid “just compensation” for the taking of their property when, in fact, they want to keep their property (in this case an “at-risk” youth boxing club), the decision has the potential to form the basis for new law or interpretations on how eminent domain is administered by every city in the state.
Local land surveyor, planner and engineer Michael Pallamary, who represented the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Justice (which provided attorneys for the youth athletic center) as an expert witness called it “arguably one of the most important land use cases to be decided in years.”